Retail Returns Policy
The reader contract

Editorial Policy

Last updated: 20th May, 2026

The editorial policy is the public contract Retail Returns Policy makes with readers. It explains how we produce content, how we fund our work, and what standards we hold ourselves to. If we ever fall short, we want you to have the language to hold us accountable.

What We Cover

Retail Returns Policywrites about the retail return itself - taking a purchase back for a refund, exchange, or store credit. We cover each store's return policy, the receipt and condition rules that decide eligibility, return windows and channels, the money and fees that come back (or don't), the gift and holiday cases, and your consumer rights when a store says no. We do not cover the merchant side of returns, tax or IRS refunds, generic banking refund mechanics, product warranties and repair, or non-US return law.

How We Decide What to Publish

Our editorial calendar is built from public search demand (which questions US shoppers returning something actually ask), gaps in existing coverage, and our editors' direct experience reading, verifying, and date-stamping store return policies. The editor-in-chief approves every topic before drafting begins; the category-owning editor writes the draft; a designated fact-checker (usually the policy-verification editor) re-checks each claim against the retailer's own official return terms; a senior editor signs off before publication.

Independence

  • We do not accept payment to publish a favorable write-up of a store's return policy.
  • We do not accept payment to change the ranking, scoring, or recommendation of a store after we've verified its policy.
  • We are not owned by, partnered with, or financially related to any retailer, manufacturer, or shopping platform.
  • Our revenue comes from (a) display advertising sold on a programmatic basis, (b) affiliate commissions on retail purchases made through links on our site, and (c) occasional clearly-labeled sponsorships (see Sponsorship Policy below).

Affiliate Disclosure

Retail Returns Policyearns affiliate commissions when you click a retail link on our site and make a purchase. These commissions help fund our operations, but they do not influence which stores we choose to cover, how we rate or rank a return policy, or how prominently a store appears in our comparisons. Store selection is determined by editorial relevance and reader demand; rankings are determined by the retailer's own verified return terms and editorial judgment. No affiliate partner receives preferential placement, and we will rank a store with a better return policy and no affiliate link above a store with a worse policy that carries one.

Sponsorship Policy

From time to time, Retail Returns Policy publishes sponsored content - articles, videos, or other media funded by a brand partner. Every piece of sponsored content is:

  • Clearly labeledwith a “Sponsored” or “Paid Partnership” tag visible before the reader begins consuming the content.
  • Editorially controlled - the sponsor may suggest a topic but may not approve, alter, or veto the final copy.
  • Separated from our policy verdicts - sponsored content never takes the form of a store return-policy verdict or appears inside a best-and-worst ranking.

Policy Sourcing Policy

Every return policy we publish is pulled directly from the retailer's own official return terms - their published policy page, help center, or in-store signage - never from a sponsor, a press contact, or a forum thread. We never let a store dictate, edit, or approve how we describe its policy, and no retailer is given advance review or exclusivity. Regardless of which store it covers, every policy goes through the same standardized verification and date-stamping process.

Conflict-of-Interest Policy

Every editor and contributor is required to disclose personal conflicts of interest to the editor-in-chief. A conflict includes, but is not limited to: a financial interest (stock, consulting fees, sponsorship) in a company whose return policy we cover; a personal or family relationship with an employee of such a company; or any prior or pending employment relationship with a retailer, manufacturer, or shopping platform in our coverage area. Disclosed conflicts are evaluated by the editor-in-chief, and the individual is recused from relevant coverage when warranted. If an editor departs Retail Returns Policy to join a company we cover, all articles they authored are re-reviewed by a remaining senior editor within 90 days.

Source Standards

Every factual claim about a specific store's return policy must trace to either (1) the retailer's own official return terms (policy page, help center, or in-store signage), (2) a verification we performed and date-stamped, or (3) a named authoritative source we explicitly trust (e.g., a state attorney general, the FTC, or published consumer-protection law). We do not cite forum posts as a source; we may quote a forum post for color, but the underlying claim must be independently verifiable against the store's official terms.

Authorship and AI Use

Every article carries the byline of a real editor on our team. Where required, every article also carries the name of the reviewer who signed off. We do not publish unattributed articles.

Our Position on AI

We do not use AI to generate article body copy. AI-assisted tooling (grammar checks, transcript clean-up, headline brainstorms) is used by our writers as a working aid only, and the final writing is theirs.

Where AI tooling is used in our research or verification pipeline - for example, monitoring a retailer's policy page for changes or structured comparison generation - the underlying data still originates from our hands-on verification against the store's official terms, and every AI-assisted output is reviewed and validated by a human editor before it informs published content. We will update this section as our tooling evolves so readers always know what role AI plays in our workflow.

When We Update

Articles older than 18 months are flagged for review. Store return policies are re-verified against the retailer's official terms on a regular cadence and re-stamped with a fresh “Last verified” date. Best-and-worst comparisons are refreshed at least once per calendar year. We never silently backdate an updated article - the “Last updated” timestamp is honest.

Mid-Cycle Updates

When a significant event affects a store's return policy between scheduled re-verifications - a shortened or extended return window, a new or changed restocking fee, a switch to store-credit-only refunds, or a holiday policy change - we update the relevant article within 14 business days and note the change with a dated inline update tag.

When We Get It Wrong

We post every correction publicly to /about/corrections/ and update the article inline with a “Correction (date): [what changed and why]” note. Reader-reported corrections are taken seriously; contact us is monitored by the editor-in-chief.

If a correction materially changes a store recommendation or a return-policy verdict, we re-notify readers who engaged with the original article through on-site update banners and, where possible, email alerts.

On the record

This policy was last reviewed and updated on 20th May, 2026. Questions or concerns can be directed to contact us.